If DeMarcus fails to provide property disclosure to Ross before submitting an offer, what obligation could he be violating?

The situation presented revolves around property disclosure laws, which are designed to protect buyers by ensuring they are informed about the condition of a property before proceeding with a transaction. In Maryland, sellers are typically required to provide a property disclosure statement to prospective buyers before they make an offer.

When DeMarcus fails to provide this disclosure to Ross, he is potentially violating legal obligations that are crucial for maintaining transparency in real estate transactions. This could make the contract voidable, meaning that Ross would have the right to back out of the contract if he feels that he has not been adequately informed about the property. The obligation to disclose significant defects and the timeline associated with providing the disclosure are part of the responsibilities that come with selling a property.

Thus, the correct choice emphasizes that DeMarcus's failure to provide the disclosure could lead to serious consequences, such as making the contract voidable at Ross's discretion. This scenario underscores the importance of disclosure requirements in real estate practices, emphasizing that these obligations exist regardless of whether significant defects are present and do not depend on the actions that Ross might choose to take.