Which scenario does NOT reflect the MREC complaints and investigations process accurately?

In the context of the Maryland Real Estate Commission (MREC) complaints and investigations process, the scenario that does not accurately reflect the procedure is one in which an administrative law judge deems a complaint worthy of further investigation after reviewing it. Typically, the investigative process is initiated by the MREC and its staff rather than being a decision made by an administrative law judge. An administrative law judge typically becomes involved later in the process, particularly if a hearing is needed to resolve disciplinary actions against a licensee.

In scenarios involving the MREC, the hearing panel or commission staff typically makes initial determinations regarding complaints and investigations. The hearing panel's role is to review complaints and decide on the next steps, such as whether to dismiss a claim for lack of evidence or forward it for further investigation. Therefore, the mention of an administrative law judge at this initial stage is not consistent with the established procedures followed by the MREC.